Guy Nagels

164 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Guy Nagels
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
  • Neurology 545
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 942
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Neurology 725
Replace Pasquale Calabrese with:
Pasquale Calabrese Switzerland
Girolama Alessandra Marfia Italy
John Zajicek United Kingdom
Letizia Leocani Italy
Jorge Matías‐Guiu Spain
Maria Carmela Tartaglia Canada
Iris‐Katharina Penner Switzerland
Jordi A. Matías‐Guiu Spain
Randolph B. Schiffer United States
Giuseppe Cazzato Italy
Guy Nagels relative to Pasquale Calabrese Switzerland Pasquale Calabrese's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Pasquale Calabrese · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Nagels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Nagels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Nagels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Nagels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Nagels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Nagels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Nagels. The network helps show where Guy Nagels may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy Nagels, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Nagels Line = papers co-authored together Guy Nagels links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007314
2 1996196
3 1997164
4 1996141
5 1997138
6 2014131
7 2010118
8 2008103
9 1996101
10
Fmrl Knockout Mice: A Model to Study Fragile X Mental Retardation The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium*
199496
11 200994
12 201593
13 201190
14 200589
15 200989
16 200789
17 200686
18 201584
19 202081
20 200980

About Guy Nagels

Guy Nagels is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Neurology, having authored 169 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (82 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (15 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.8k citations), Neurology (545 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (942 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Neurology (725 citations). Guy Nagels has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marie D’hooghe, Peter Paul De Deyn, Jacques De Keyser, Daphne Kos, Eric Kerckhofs, Jeroen Van Schependom, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, S Ilsbroukx, Rishi Sheorajpanday and Arie Weeren. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, European Journal of Neurology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Human Brain Mapping.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact