Guy Nagels

165 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

Guy Nagels
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.7k
  • Neurology 448
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 960
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 612
  • Neurology 470
Replace Girolama Alessandra Marfia with:
Girolama Alessandra Marfia Italy
John Zajicek United Kingdom
Valentina Tomassini Italy
Iris‐Katharina Penner Switzerland
Maria Carmela Tartaglia Canada
Giuseppe Cazzato Italy
Till Sprenger Switzerland
Jorge Matías‐Guiu Spain
Randolph B. Schiffer United States
Achim Berthele Germany
Guy Nagels relative to Girolama Alessandra Marfia Italy Girolama Alessandra Marfia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Girolama Alessandra Marfia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Nagels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Nagels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Nagels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Nagels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Nagels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Nagels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Nagels. The network helps show where Guy Nagels may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy Nagels, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Nagels Line = papers co-authored together Guy Nagels links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007321
2 1996210
3 1997174
4 1996156
5 1997149
6 2014133
7 2010132
8 1996116
9 2008107
10
Fmrl Knockout Mice: A Model to Study Fragile X Mental Retardation The Dutch-Belgian Fragile X Consortium*
1994102
11 2009100
12 200596
13 201596
14 200995
15 201195
16 200794
17 201586
18 200686
19 202085
20 200984

About Guy Nagels

Guy Nagels is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 171 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (73 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.7k citations), Neurology (448 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (960 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (612 citations) and Neurology (470 citations). Guy Nagels has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marie D’hooghe, Peter Paul De Deyn, Jacques De Keyser, Daphne Kos, Eric Kerckhofs, Jeroen Van Schependom, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Rishi Sheorajpanday, Arie Weeren and Miguel D’haeseleer. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, European Journal of Neurology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Human Brain Mapping and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact