Daniel Głód
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Plant Science top 10%
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Medicinal Plant Research
- Berry genetics and cultivation research
Papers in
-
- Chromatography in Natural Products 8
-
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 6
- Co-authors
- Mirosława Krauze‐Baranowska (20 shared papers)Maria Łuczkiewicz (5 shared papers)Magdalena Majdan (8 shared papers)Anna Kawiak (4 shared papers)Loretta Pobłocka‐Olech (7 shared papers)Adam Kokotkiewicz (2 shared papers)Rafał Hałasa (3 shared papers)Aleksandra Królicka (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Daniel Głód
27 papers receiving 740 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Biochemistry 148
- Plant Science 217
- Complementary and alternative medicine 45
- Analytical Chemistry 50
- Food Science 78
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Głód
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Głód's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Głód with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Głód more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Głód
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Głód. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Głód. The network helps show where Daniel Głód may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Głód, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 18 | HPLC of flavanones and chalcones in different species and clones of Salix. | 2013 | 14 |
| 19 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 9 |
About Daniel Głód
Daniel Głód is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Biochemistry, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (8 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (6 papers), Medicinal Plant Research (3 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (2 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (2 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (148 citations), Plant Science (217 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (45 citations), Analytical Chemistry (50 citations) and Food Science (78 citations). Daniel Głód has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Mirosława Krauze‐Baranowska, Maria Łuczkiewicz, Magdalena Majdan, Anna Kawiak, Loretta Pobłocka‐Olech, Adam Kokotkiewicz, Rafał Hałasa, Aleksandra Królicka, Izabela Fecka and Tomasz Bączek. Their work appears in journals such as Food & Function, Acta Pharmaceutica, Plant Science, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.