Daniel Głód

871 citations
26 papers · 707 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 5
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 4
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 2

Daniel Głód

26 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Daniel Głód
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Biochemistry 195
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 80
  • Plant Science 311
  • Food Science 131
  • Biotechnology 48
Replace K.M. Maria John with:
K.M. Maria John South Korea
S. Saravanan India
Elaine A. Porter United Kingdom
Sylwia Zielińska Poland
Guoxing Jing China
José Luis Ordóñez-Díaz Spain
Dea Baričević Slovenia
Marcos Taveira Portugal
Daniel Głód relative to K.M. Maria John South Korea K.M. Maria John's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
K.M. Maria John · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Głód

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Głód's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Głód with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Głód more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Głód

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Głód. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Głód. The network helps show where Daniel Głód may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Głód, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Głód Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Głód links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201471
2 201463
3 201455
4 201652
5 200352
6 201247
7 200742
8 201441
9 201240
10 201436
11 201026
12 201025
13 200425
14 201524
15 201619
16 201914
17 202114
18
HPLC of flavanones and chalcones in different species and clones of Salix.
201314
19 202113
20 20169

About Daniel Głód

Daniel Głód is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biochemistry, Food Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Flavonoids in Medical Research (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers) and Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (195 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (80 citations), Plant Science (311 citations), Food Science (131 citations) and Biotechnology (48 citations). Daniel Głód has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Mirosława Krauze‐Baranowska, Maria Łuczkiewicz, Magdalena Majdan, Anna Kawiak, Loretta Pobłocka‐Olech, Adam Kokotkiewicz, Rafał Hałasa, Aleksandra Królicka, Izabela Fecka and Yvan Vander Heyden. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Science, Acta Pharmaceutica, Food & Function, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact