Daniel Gill

29 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Daniel Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Radiation 103
  • Aerospace Engineering 187
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Numerical Analysis 19
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Replace Binh T. Pham with:
Binh T. Pham United States
Itthi Chatnuntawech Thailand
Shashanka Venkataramanan India
Oliver Larkin United Kingdom
Stuart J. Starr United States
F. García Finland
Masashi Ito Japan
Voichiţa Maxim France
Ali Zamani Iran
Ken Stephenson United States
Daniel Gill relative to Binh T. Pham United States Binh T. Pham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Binh T. Pham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gill. The network helps show where Daniel Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gill Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200583
2 201462
3 201854
4 201445
5 201634
6 201433
7 201129
8 201721
9 201420
10 201119
11 202015
12 201413
13 20176
14 20006
15 20145
16
Newton -Krylov methods for the solution of the k-eigenvalue problem in multigroup neutronics calculations
20095
17 20154
18
Movable geometry and eigenvalue search capability in the MC21 Monte Carlo code
20134
19 20213
20 20122

About Daniel Gill

Daniel Gill is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (14 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (103 citations), Aerospace Engineering (187 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations), Numerical Analysis (19 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Daniel Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Intrator, Y.Y. Azmy, Philippe G. Schyns, Oliver Garrod, Rachael E. Jack, Christian Hansel, David L. Millman, Timothy Trumbull, Daniel S. McGehee and Michael R. Bruchas. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Journal of Vision, Nuclear Technology, Psychological Science and Neurocomputing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact