Daniel Gill

27 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

Daniel Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Radiation 104
  • Aerospace Engineering 185
  • Numerical Analysis 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
  • Signal Processing 33
Replace Binh T. Pham with:
Binh T. Pham United States
Oliver Larkin United Kingdom
Masashi Ito Japan
Itthi Chatnuntawech Thailand
Hong Xiang China
F. García Finland
Jonas Gårding Sweden
R. F. Wagner United States
Rolf‐Rainer Grigat Germany
David San Segundo Bello Belgium
Daniel Gill relative to Binh T. Pham United States Binh T. Pham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
Binh T. Pham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gill. The network helps show where Daniel Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gill Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200580
2 201460
3 201850
4 201443
5 201433
6 201633
7 201129
8 201420
9 201720
10 201119
11 202015
12 201414
13 20006
14
Newton -Krylov methods for the solution of the k-eigenvalue problem in multigroup neutronics calculations
20095
15 20145
16
Movable geometry and eigenvalue search capability in the MC21 Monte Carlo code
20134
17 20154
18 20174
19 20213
20 20212

About Daniel Gill

Daniel Gill is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiation, Materials Chemistry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (104 citations), Aerospace Engineering (185 citations), Numerical Analysis (19 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations) and Signal Processing (33 citations). Daniel Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Intrator, Y.Y. Azmy, Oliver Garrod, Philippe G. Schyns, Rachael E. Jack, Christian Hansel, David L. Millman, Thomas M. Sutton, D.C. Carpenter and Timothy Trumbull. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Science and Engineering, Journal of Vision, Nuclear Technology, Neurocomputing and PLoS Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact