Stuart J. Starr

715 citations
14 papers · 601 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart J. Starr

14 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Stuart J. Starr
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Ophthalmology 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 171
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 160
  • Radiation 25
  • Molecular Biology 179
Replace A. van Meeteren with:
A. van Meeteren Netherlands
Otto H. Schade United States
C. Bonifazzi Italy
Rafael Navarro Spain
F. Fankhauser Switzerland
Michael E. Breton United States
Glyn Walsh United Kingdom
Jeff Rabin United States
Hitoshi Ohzu Japan
Mark M. Bahn United States
Stuart J. Starr relative to A. van Meeteren Netherlands A. van Meeteren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
A. van Meeteren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart J. Starr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart J. Starr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart J. Starr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart J. Starr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart J. Starr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart J. Starr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart J. Starr. The network helps show where Stuart J. Starr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Stuart J. Starr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart J. Starr Line = papers co-authored together Stuart J. Starr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1975167
2 198479
3 197668
4 197954
5 197843
6 197841
7 197638
8 197630
9 198325
10 197619
11 198014
12
Quantitative evaluation of visual detection performance in medicine: ROC analysis and determination of diagnostic benefit
197612
13 19998
14
Quantitative evaluation of medical imaging
19773

About Stuart J. Starr

Stuart J. Starr is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (171 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (160 citations), Radiation (25 citations) and Molecular Biology (179 citations). Stuart J. Starr has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lee B. Lusted, Charles E. Metz, Joel Pokorny, Vivianne C. Smith, David J. Goodenough, Robert W. Massof, David Finkelstein, Lijuan Wu, Christopher C. Perry and Mary A. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, Vision Research, Physics in Medicine and Biology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact