Daniel Geiger

71 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniel Geiger
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 347
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
  • Strategy and Management 229
  • Hepatology 75
  • Communication 78
Replace Irwin B. Horwitz with:
Irwin B. Horwitz United States
Miguel A. Quiñones United States
Janice S. Miller United States
John C. Scott United States
Elizabeth Maitland Australia
Brendan Boyle Australia
Linda C. Wang United States
James M. Pappas United States
Tai Gyu Kim South Korea
Abhik Roy United States
Daniel Geiger relative to Irwin B. Horwitz United States Irwin B. Horwitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Irwin B. Horwitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Geiger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Geiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Geiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Geiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Geiger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Geiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Geiger. The network helps show where Daniel Geiger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Geiger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Geiger Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Geiger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009120
2 2016110
3 202094
4 200975
5 201274
6 201471
7 201670
8 201564
9 200963
10 197857
11 199850
12 200739
13 201235
14 200931
15 200931
16 201428
17 201327
18 201525
19 201325
20 200921

About Daniel Geiger

Daniel Geiger is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (20 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (11 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (4 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (4 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (347 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Strategy and Management (229 citations), Hepatology (75 citations) and Communication (78 citations). Daniel Geiger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Anja Danner‐Schröder, Georg Schreyögg, Carlo Catalano, Elena P. Antonacopoulou, Waldemar Kremser, Roberto Passariello, Michael S. Aßländer, Peter Eberl, Alessandro Napoli and Michele Di Martino. Their work appears in journals such as La radiologia medica, Organization Studies, Culture and Organization, Journal of Management Studies and Management Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact