Daniel Gechter

446 citations
6 papers · 387 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gechter

6 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Daniel Gechter
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Environmental Chemistry 264
  • Water Science and Technology 110
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 103
  • Pollution 84
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 79
Replace Cláudia L. Caldeira with:
Cláudia L. Caldeira Brazil
Christina C. Davis United States
Andreas Fritzsche Germany
Mark D. Beuhler United States
Ilwon Ko South Korea
Jacqueline Mejia United States
Salim Öncel Türkiye
Christophe Tiffreau France
Zhenxing Wang China
Van Q. Chiu United States
Daniel Gechter relative to Cláudia L. Caldeira Brazil Cláudia L. Caldeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Cláudia L. Caldeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gechter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gechter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gechter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gechter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gechter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gechter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gechter. The network helps show where Daniel Gechter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gechter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gechter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gechter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Daniel Gechter

Daniel Gechter is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics, Environmental Chemistry and Water Science and Technology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Groundwater flow and contamination studies (4 papers), Karst Systems and Hydrogeology (2 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (2 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (2 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (2 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (1 paper), Advanced oxidation water treatment (1 paper) and Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (264 citations), Water Science and Technology (110 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (103 citations), Pollution (84 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (79 citations). Daniel Gechter has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Martin Wegelin, Stephan J. Hug, Urs von Gunten, Peter Huggenberger, Philippe Ackerer, Eric Zechner, H.N. Waber, M. Konz, Abdullah Al Mahmud and Η. Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Hydrology and earth system sciences, Water Resources Research and Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact