Daniel G. Smith
Impact in
-
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 6
- Co-authors
- Jill L. Silverman (2 shared papers)Jacqueline N. Crawley (2 shared papers)Meera E. Modi (3 shared papers)Sarah J. Neal Webb (1 shared paper)Zoë A. Hughes (1 shared paper)Stephanie M. McTighe (1 shared paper)Qian Lin (1 shared paper)Dianne K. Bryce (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuropsychopharmacology (3 papers)Clinical Biochemistry (1 paper)Molecular Autism (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandSweden
In The Last Decade
Daniel G. Smith
13 papers receiving 744 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 106
- Behavioral Neuroscience 56
- Cognitive Neuroscience 302
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 237
- Biological Psychiatry 24
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Smith. The network helps show where Daniel G. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 211 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 116 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 99 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 95 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 9 | Production potential of Fuerte on seedling rootstocks | 1992 | 9 |
| 10 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 11 | HORTICULTURAL PERFORMANCE OF IMPORTED CULTIVARS AND ROOTSTOCKS IN THE NORTH-EASTERN TRANSVAAL | 1993 | 6 |
| 12 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 13 | PROGRESS WITH THE SINGLE TREE MANAGEMENT CONCEPT | 1993 | 3 |
| 14 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 16 | EVALUATION OF NEW AVOCADO SCION AND ROOTSTOCK CULTIVARS | 1994 | 0 |
About Daniel G. Smith
Daniel G. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (106 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (302 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (237 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (24 citations). Daniel G. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jill L. Silverman, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Meera E. Modi, Sarah J. Neal Webb, Zoë A. Hughes, Stephanie M. McTighe, Qian Lin, Dianne K. Bryce, Deborah L. Smith and Kari R. Fonseca. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Autism, Alzheimer s & Dementia and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.