Daniel G. Bates

755 citations
32 papers · 555 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel G. Bates

28 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 191
  • Paleontology 115
  • Anthropology 125
  • Archeology 79
  • Archeology 8
Replace Anatoly M. Khazanov with:
Anatoly M. Khazanov United States
Gudrun Dahl Sweden
Lawrence A. Kuznar United States
Thomas Edward Sheridan United States
Terry G. Jordan United States
Dan L. Flores United States
Wayne Suttles United States
Bruce Albert France
Alfredo López Austin Mexico
国立民族学博物館
Daniel G. Bates relative to Anatoly M. Khazanov United States Anatoly M. Khazanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Anatoly M. Khazanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Bates. The network helps show where Daniel G. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Bates Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009127
2 197481
3 197758
4 197346
5
Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East
198339
6 197135
7
Human Adaptive Strategies: Ecology, Culture, and Politics
199726
8 199623
9 201017
10 198416
11 199415
12 197414
13 202111
14
Studies in human ecology and adaptation
20059
15 19725
16
Humanism in undergraduate medical education.
19714
17 19724
18 20133
19 20163
20 20133

About Daniel G. Bates

Daniel G. Bates is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Museology, Language and Linguistics, Anthropology and Food Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (9 papers), Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies (5 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Animal Diversity and Health Studies (3 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (2 papers), Diverse Education and Engineering Focus (2 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (191 citations), Paleontology (115 citations), Anthropology (125 citations), Archeology (79 citations) and Archeology (8 citations). Daniel G. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Susan H. Lees, Pippa Chenevix Trench, Amal Rassam, Geoff Wright and Judith E. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as Human Ecology, American Anthropologist, Anthropological Quarterly, African and Asian Studies and Comparative Studies in Society and History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact