William P. Mitchell

18 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

William P. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Paleontology 88
  • Archeology 11
  • Anthropology 100
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 30
  • Space and Planetary Science 7
Replace Robert C. Hunt with:
Robert C. Hunt United States
Thomas M Whitmore United States
Marc G. Stevenson Canada
Richard B. Woodbury United States
Malcolm C. Webb United States
John C. Wilkinson United Kingdom
Ian Farrington Australia
Terje Oestigaard Norway
Willem Jongman Netherlands
Ross W. Jamieson Canada
William P. Mitchell relative to Robert C. Hunt United States Robert C. Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Robert C. Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William P. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Mitchell. The network helps show where William P. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside William P. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William P. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together William P. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197677
2 197651
3 197351
4
Irrigation at high altitudes: the social organization of water control systems in the Andes.
199447
5 198737
6 199330
7 199120
8 199211
9 20006
10 19904
11
The system of power in Quinua : a community of the central Peruvian highlands
19723
12 20063
13 19852
14 19932
15 19922
16 19922
17 19931
18 20201
19 20061
20 19911

About William P. Mitchell

William P. Mitchell is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Anthropology, Ecology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (5 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers), Latin American history and culture (3 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (2 papers), Agriculture, Water, and Health (1 paper), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (1 paper), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (88 citations), Archeology (11 citations), Anthropology (100 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (30 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (7 citations). William P. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Paraguay and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David Guillet, Orin Starn, Robert C. Hunt, P. Coy, Russell E. Lewis, John W. Bennett, William L. Partridge, Wolf Roder, Robert Wade and Barbara J. Price. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, American Anthropologist, Comparative drama, The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology and Human Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact