Daniel Frischemeier

32 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Daniel Frischemeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Statistics and Probability 110
  • Computer Science Applications 26
  • Information Systems and Management 10
  • Management Information Systems 11
  • Education 35
Replace Cliff Konold with:
Cliff Konold United States
Ana Elisa Castro Sotos Belgium
Elsa Medina United States
Gail Burrill United States
Sibel Kazak Türkiye
Dewi Herawaty Indonesia
Wim van der Linden Netherlands
Zetra Hainul Putra Indonesia
Ahmad Wachidul Kohar Indonesia
Jingchen Hu United States
Daniel Frischemeier relative to Cliff Konold United States Cliff Konold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Cliff Konold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Frischemeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Frischemeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Frischemeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Frischemeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Frischemeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Frischemeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Frischemeier. The network helps show where Daniel Frischemeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Frischemeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Frischemeier Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Frischemeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201830
2 201816
3 202010
4 201710
5 20218
6 20218
7 20197
8 20197
9 20205
10 20214
11 20164
12 20203
13 20163
14 20183
15 20123
16 20183
17 20242
18 20242
19 20222
20 20222

About Daniel Frischemeier

Daniel Frischemeier is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 34 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistics Education and Methodologies (29 papers), Data Analysis with R (11 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (3 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (2 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper) and Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (110 citations), Computer Science Applications (26 citations), Information Systems and Management (10 citations), Management Information Systems (11 citations) and Education (35 citations). Daniel Frischemeier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Cyprus and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Biehler, Carsten Schulte, Aisling Leavy, Joachim Engel, Angela Schwering, Laura Martignon, Christoph Selter, Sibel Kazak, Efi Paparistodemou and Μaria Meletiou-Mavrotheris. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics Education Research Journal, Mathematics Education Research Journal, ZDM, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education and Teaching Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact