Daniel Ferguson

19 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Daniel Ferguson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health 345
  • Modeling and Simulation 75
  • History and Philosophy of Science 70
  • Infectious Diseases 151
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
Replace Nadja Durbach with:
Nadja Durbach United States
Mark A. Largent United States
Katherine Kricorian United States
Shimaa M. Saied Egypt
Marta Caserotti Italy
Ariel Fridman United States
Kate Sollis Australia
Eugenia Tognotti Italy
Megan Cutts United Kingdom
Fanxing Du China
Daniel Ferguson relative to Nadja Durbach United States Nadja Durbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Nadja Durbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ferguson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ferguson. The network helps show where Daniel Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ferguson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ferguson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ferguson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020372
2 201929
3 202021
4 202115
5
Coronavirus: the lockdown laws
202112
6 202111
7 20219
8 19786
9 19846
10 20224
11 20224
12 20234
13 20244
14 19893
15 20192
16
FAQs: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
20212
17 20231
18
Patient representatives and the law.
19901
19
The covid-19 outbreak and employment rights
20211
20
Judicial Review and Courts Bill
20211

About Daniel Ferguson

Daniel Ferguson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Social Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (8 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper) and Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (345 citations), Modeling and Simulation (75 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (70 citations), Infectious Diseases (151 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (129 citations). Daniel Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Fiji. Frequent co-authors include Jamie L. Jensen, Savannah Hughes, Bradford K. Berges, Abraham Quaye, Brian D. Poole, Carter Stancil, Sarah Barber, Jennifer Brown, Seth Bybee and Walter Cho. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution Education and Outreach, Vaccines, PLoS ONE, CBE—Life Sciences Education and Insect Systematics & Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact