Daniel E. Re
Impact in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Developmental Biology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 25
- Marketing 15
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification 15
- Co-authors
- David I. Perrett (17 shared papers)Nicholas O. Rule (10 shared papers)David R. Feinberg (5 shared papers)Dengke Xiao (4 shared papers)Jillian J.M. O’Connor (4 shared papers)Benedict C. Jones (5 shared papers)Ross Whitehead (3 shared papers)Lisa M. DeBruine (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (6 papers)Perception (4 papers)Evolutionary Psychology (3 papers)Social Psychological and Personality Science (2 papers)Journal of Mammalogy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Daniel E. Re
33 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 654
- Developmental Biology 61
- Marketing 254
- Sensory Systems 77
- Museology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Re
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Re's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Re with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Re more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Re
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Re. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Re. The network helps show where Daniel E. Re may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Re, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 91 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 68 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 21 |
About Daniel E. Re
Daniel E. Re is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Museology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (25 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (5 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (5 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (654 citations), Developmental Biology (61 citations), Marketing (254 citations), Sensory Systems (77 citations) and Museology (53 citations). Daniel E. Re has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include David I. Perrett, Nicholas O. Rule, David R. Feinberg, Dengke Xiao, Jillian J.M. O’Connor, Benedict C. Jones, Ross Whitehead, Lisa M. DeBruine, Bernard Tiddeman and Vinet Coetzee. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Perception, Evolutionary Psychology, Social Psychological and Personality Science and Journal of Mammalogy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.