Daniel E. Cohen

1.1k citations
28 papers · 596 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Cohen

27 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Cohen
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 183
  • Geometry and Topology 415
  • Algebra and Number Theory 112
  • Mathematical Physics 219
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 230
Replace Luis Ribes with:
Luis Ribes Canada
A. Yu. Olshanskii Russia
M. I. Kargapolov Ukraine
Stephen H. McCleary United States
В. Н. Ремесленников Russia
Burton Fein United States
Paul Hill United States
James Howie United Kingdom
Сергей Иванович Адян Russia
Pak‐Ken Wong United States
Daniel E. Cohen relative to Luis Ribes Canada Luis Ribes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Luis Ribes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Cohen. The network helps show where Daniel E. Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Cohen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Cohen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Cohen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993116
2 1989105
3 197280
4 196758
5 195435
6 199329
7 196323
8 197422
9 195719
10 199214
11 199312
12 199711
13 199110
14 19709
15 19688
16
Computability and Logic
19877
17 19766
18 19636
19 19955
20 19685

About Daniel E. Cohen

Daniel E. Cohen is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (8 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (183 citations), Geometry and Topology (415 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (112 citations), Mathematical Physics (219 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (230 citations). Daniel E. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Roger C. Lyndon, Klaus Madlener, Friedrich Otto, Thierry Dana-Picard and Frank Harary. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Mathematika, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Mathematische Zeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact