Daniel D. Burkey

41 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

Daniel D. Burkey
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Architecture 80
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 155
  • Media Technology 84
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 58
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
Replace Keith Sheppard with:
Keith Sheppard United States
Katherine Chen United States
Mansur Floridovich Galikhanov Russia
Young Rae Kim United States
Manfred J. Hampe Germany
Lorico DS. Lapitan Philippines
Holly McIlwee Golecki United States
Phillip A. Sanger United States
Erik Verlage United States
Eunhye Kim United States
Daniel D. Burkey relative to Keith Sheppard United States Keith Sheppard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.1×
Keith Sheppard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Burkey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Burkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Burkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Burkey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Burkey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Burkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Burkey. The network helps show where Daniel D. Burkey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Burkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Burkey Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Burkey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015175
2 200386
3 200443
4 200332
5 200828
6 201624
7 200316
8 202016
9 201514
10 201013
11 201313
12 201210
13 202010
14 20198
15 20208
16 20208
17 20248
18 20137
19 20156
20 20186

About Daniel D. Burkey

Daniel D. Burkey is a scholar working on Architecture, Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 49 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Education and Pedagogy (21 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (18 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (14 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (10 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (4 papers), Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry (4 papers) and Advanced Materials and Semiconductor Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (80 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (155 citations), Media Technology (84 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (58 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations). Daniel D. Burkey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Karen K. Gleason, Daniel D. Anastasio, Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rebecca Lyn Carrier, Katherine S. Ziemer, Matthew E. Cooper, Bing Sun, Brian J. McMahon, Brittany Butler and Richard Cimino. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Vapor Deposition, Chemical Engineering Education, Education for Chemical Engineers, Biomacromolecules and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact