Daniel Côté

2.0k citations
65 papers · 630 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Côté

56 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Daniel Côté
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 48
  • General Health Professions 164
  • Pharmacology 91
  • Family Practice 9
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 8
Replace Julie Ponto with:
Julie Ponto United States
Sandra L. Siedlecki United States
Ged Murtagh United Kingdom
Vanina Mollo France
Steve M. Dorman United States
Margreet Duetz Switzerland
Valentina Lichtner United Kingdom
Zara Whysall United Kingdom
Sue S. Feldman United States
April Savoy United States
Daniel Côté relative to Julie Ponto United States Julie Ponto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Julie Ponto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Côté

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Côté's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Côté with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Côté more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Côté

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Côté. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Côté. The network helps show where Daniel Côté may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Côté, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Côté Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Côté links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012101
2 200961
3 202150
4 201240
5 201033
6 200733
7 201229
8 201221
9 202021
10 201921
11 200819
12 201118
13 200714
14 200513
15 201311
16 200410
17 20179
18 20128
19 20128
20 20207

About Daniel Côté

Daniel Côté is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 65 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Practices (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (48 citations), General Health Professions (164 citations), Pharmacology (91 citations), Family Practice (9 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (8 citations). Daniel Côté has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Marie‐France Coutu, Raymond Baril, Marie‐José Durand, Christelle Lison, D. Dalle, Denis Bédard, Geneviève Cadieux, Liesje Coertjens, Sylvie Gravel and Sofie M. M. Loyens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, American Journal of Industrial Medicine and Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact