Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

6.7k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 2019

Impact in

  • Surgery top 10%
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Hip disorders and treatments
    • Sports injuries and prevention

Papers in

    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 311
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 279
    • Hip disorders and treatments 117
    • Sports injuries and prevention 57
    • Foot and Ankle Surgery 31

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

949 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Peers

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Surgery 4.2k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 650
  • Health Informatics 174
  • Rehabilitation 195
  • Health 236
Replace JAAOS Global Research and Reviews with:
JAAOS Global Research and Reviews United States
Canadian Journal of Surgery Canada
JBJS Reviews United States
Orthopedic Reviews United States
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
Croatian Medical Journal Croatia
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery South Korea
Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease United States
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Italy
Patient Safety in Surgery United States
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation relative to JAAOS Global Research and Reviews United States JAAOS Global Research and Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
JAAOS Global Research and Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation.

About Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

The 1.1k papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation usually cover Surgery (757 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (108 papers), Rehabilitation (48 papers), Health Informatics (13 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 papers) specifically the topics of Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (311 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (279 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (117 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (57 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (44 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (41 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (31 papers) and Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation are Brian J. Cole, Mary K. Mulcahey, Timothy Edwin Hewett, Brian Forsythe, Ron Gilat, Bart Dingenen, Alli Gokeler, Nikhil N. Verma, Adam Blair Yanke and Eoghan T. Hurley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact