Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

5.9k citations
1.0k papers · · active since 1953

Impact in

    • Sports injuries and prevention
    • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Hip disorders and treatments

Papers in

    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 246
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 226
    • Hip disorders and treatments 105
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 20
    • Sports injuries and prevention 41
    • Tendon Structure and Treatment 21

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

757 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 905
  • Surgery 3.7k
  • Health Informatics 112
  • Rehabilitation 151
  • Epidemiology 555
Replace JAAOS Global Research and Reviews with:
JAAOS Global Research and Reviews United States
Canadian Journal of Surgery Canada
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Australia
Endocrinology and Metabolism South Korea
Orthopedic Reviews United States
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
JBJS Reviews United States
The Journal of Medical Investigation Japan
Chinese Journal of Traumatology China
Pain Research and Management Canada
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation relative to JAAOS Global Research and Reviews United States JAAOS Global Research and Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
JAAOS Global Research and Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation.

About Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation

The 1.0k papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation usually cover Surgery (615 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (73 papers), Health Informatics (9 papers), Rehabilitation (23 papers) and Health (17 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (246 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (226 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (105 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (41 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (40 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (25 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (21 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation are Mary K. Mulcahey, Brian Forsythe, Timothy E. Hewett, Brian J. Cole, Alli Gokeler, Bart Dingenen, Adam B. Yanke, Eoghan T. Hurley, Nikhil N. Verma and M. Lane Moore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact