C. L. Dolph
Impact in
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
- Numerical methods in inverse problems
- Applied Mathematics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Numerical methods in inverse problems 3
- advanced mathematical theories 2
- Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics 2
-
- Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis 3
- Co-authors
- Daniel C. Lewis (1 shared paper)Max A. Woodbury (1 shared paper)Jacques Derome (1 shared paper)Richard B. Barrar (1 shared paper)R. V. Churchill (1 shared paper)J. E. McLaughlin (1 shared paper)R.J. Lomax (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (1 paper)Indiana University Mathematics Journal (1 paper)Mathematische Zeitschrift (1 paper)Planetary and Space Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. L. Dolph
14 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Mathematical Physics 70
- Applied Mathematics 48
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 42
- Mechanics of Materials 76
- Computational Mechanics 55
Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Dolph
This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Dolph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Dolph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Dolph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. L. Dolph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Dolph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Dolph. The network helps show where C. L. Dolph may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. L. Dolph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1954 | 82 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1958 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1952 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1954 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1956 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1954 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1954 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1957 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 15 | On the nonlinear theory of multistream electronic devices | 1963 | 0 |
About C. L. Dolph
C. L. Dolph is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Applied Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (3 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (3 papers), advanced mathematical theories (2 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (2 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (1 paper) and Numerical methods in engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (70 citations), Applied Mathematics (48 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (42 citations), Mechanics of Materials (76 citations) and Computational Mechanics (55 citations). C. L. Dolph has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel C. Lewis, Max A. Woodbury, Jacques Derome, Richard B. Barrar, R. V. Churchill, J. E. McLaughlin and R.J. Lomax. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Indiana University Mathematics Journal, Mathematische Zeitschrift, Planetary and Space Science and Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.