Daniel C. Fielder

726 citations
44 papers · 499 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Fielder

36 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Daniel C. Fielder
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Parasitology 37
  • Insect Science 70
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 92
  • Genetics 102
  • Horticulture 3
Replace Richard Carter with:
Richard Carter United States
Elizabeth Halloran United States
Siavash Vahdati Daneshmand Germany
Tobias Polzin Germany
Michael W. Fleming United States
D. D. Ang United States
Yaniv Ovadia United States
Nicolas Wieseke Germany
Magnus Manske United Kingdom
Wiremu Solomon New Zealand
Daniel C. Fielder relative to Richard Carter United States Richard Carter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Richard Carter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Fielder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Fielder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Fielder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Fielder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Fielder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Fielder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Fielder. The network helps show where Daniel C. Fielder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Fielder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Fielder Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Fielder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010309
2 201045
3 196119
4 195814
5 197312
6 197012
7 19599
8 19607
9 19616
10 19676
11 19995
12 19695
13 19644
14
A Generator of Rook Polynomials
20043
15 19893
16 19743
17 19653
18 19593
19 19583
20 19893

About Daniel C. Fielder

Daniel C. Fielder is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical Methods and Algorithms (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (6 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (3 papers), Graph theory and applications (3 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (3 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (2 papers) and Antenna Design and Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (37 citations), Insect Science (70 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (92 citations), Genetics (102 citations) and Horticulture (3 citations). Daniel C. Fielder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yaniv Ovadia, Ran Libeskind-Hadas, S. Roy, Thomas K. Gaylord, Mir Mojtaba Mirsalehi and Clark C. Guest. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Education, Proceedings of the IEEE, Mathematics of Computation, Journal of Computational Biology and Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact