Algorithms for Molecular Biology

10.3k citations
438 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
    • Gene expression and cancer classification
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics

Papers in

    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 110
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 47
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 33
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 28
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics 18
    • Genome Rearrangement Algorithms 41

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

313 papers receiving 7.8k citations

Peers

Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Molecular Biology 7.4k
  • Cancer Research 915
  • Genetics 1.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 969
  • Plant Science 1.0k
Replace Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology with:
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology United States
Theory in Biosciences Germany
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling United States
Comparative and Functional Genomics United States
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights United States
WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine United States
Journal of Biology China
Evolutionary Bioinformatics United States
BMC Structural Biology United States
Current Opinion in Systems Biology United States
Algorithms for Molecular Biology relative to Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology United States Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algorithms for Molecular Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

About Algorithms for Molecular Biology

The 438 papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology in the last decades have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Algorithms for Molecular Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (242 papers), Genetics (75 papers), Artificial Intelligence (51 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (15 papers) and Paleontology (6 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (110 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (47 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (47 papers), Genome Rearrangement Algorithms (41 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (33 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (28 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (20 papers) and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Algorithms for Molecular Biology are Peter F. Stadler, Ivo L. Hofacker, Christoph Flamm, Stephan Wolf, Hakim Tafer, Ronny Lorenz, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen, Rayan Chikhi, Guillaume Rizk and Burkhard Morgenstern.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact