Daniel C. Fehder

15 papers receiving 396 citations

Daniel C. Fehder's Hit Papers

The design of startup accelerators 2019 · 262 citations
2620+2+4Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Daniel C. Fehder
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 242
  • Business and International Management 46
  • Accounting 159
  • Strategy and Management 85
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 46
Replace Paige A. Clayton with:
Paige A. Clayton United States
Nigel Wadeson United Kingdom
Tino Sanandaji Sweden
Julian S. Frankish United Kingdom
Christoph Hornych Germany
Curtis R. Sproul United States
Mikael J Samuelsson Sweden
Abdullahil Mamun Bangladesh
Keith S. Glancey United Kingdom
Vesna Mandakovic Chile
Daniel C. Fehder relative to Paige A. Clayton United States Paige A. Clayton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paige A. Clayton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Fehder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Fehder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Fehder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Fehder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Fehder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Fehder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Fehder. The network helps show where Daniel C. Fehder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Fehder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Fehder Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Fehder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
The design of startup accelerators
Hit paper breakdown →
2019262
2 202125
3 201823
4 201521
5 201418
6 202214
7 202310
8 20199
9 20237
10 20197
11 20086
12 20223
13 20242
14 20251
15 20261

About Daniel C. Fehder

Daniel C. Fehder is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing and Information Systems and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers) and Research, Science, and Academia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (242 citations), Business and International Management (46 citations), Accounting (159 citations), Strategy and Management (85 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (46 citations). Daniel C. Fehder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Yael V. Hochberg, Fiona Alana Murray, Susan L. Cohen, Scott Stern, Tristan L. Botelho, Fiona Murray, Milan Miric, Pai-Ling Yin, Florenta Teodoridis and Joseph Raffiee. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Science, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of Economic Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact