Daniel Bourquin
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 7
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Rudolf Brenneisen (11 shared papers)Felix Hasler (4 shared papers)F.X. Vollenweider (2 shared papers)T. Bär (1 shared paper)David Vonlanthen (2 shared papers)Franz X. Vollenweider (1 shared paper)Ján Styk (1 shared paper)Wolfgang Thormann (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies (1 paper)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (1 paper)Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (1 paper)Journal of Chromatography A (1 paper)Analytica Chimica Acta (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Switzerland
In The Last Decade
Daniel Bourquin
12 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Toxicology 264
- Clinical Psychology 354
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 176
- Pharmacology 55
- Pharmacology 99
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bourquin
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bourquin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bourquin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bourquin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bourquin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bourquin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bourquin. The network helps show where Daniel Bourquin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bourquin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 190 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 82 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 10 |
About Daniel Bourquin
Daniel Bourquin is a scholar working on Toxicology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (264 citations), Clinical Psychology (354 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (176 citations), Pharmacology (55 citations) and Pharmacology (99 citations). Daniel Bourquin has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Brenneisen, Felix Hasler, F.X. Vollenweider, T. Bär, David Vonlanthen, Franz X. Vollenweider, Ján Styk, Wolfgang Thormann, Thomas Lehmann and Thomas‐Nicolas Lehmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Journal of Chromatography A and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.