Daniel Bosch

907 citations
17 papers · 709 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bosch

17 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Daniel Bosch
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 73
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 295
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 218
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Genetics 88
Replace Ramona Marino with:
Ramona Marino Italy
Lin Pan China
Filip Vanevski United States
Zhenjie Zhang United States
Hongyu Ruan United States
Thomas N. Gaitanos Germany
Luciano Marpegán Argentina
Mika Akiyoshi Japan
Christopher A. Chapleau United States
Jennifer Larimore United States
Daniel Bosch relative to Ramona Marino Italy Ramona Marino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Ramona Marino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bosch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bosch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bosch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bosch. The network helps show where Daniel Bosch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bosch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bosch Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bosch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011194
2 201493
3 201577
4 201657
5 201049
6 200845
7 200640
8 200928
9 201226
10 201525
11 201121
12 200718
13 201516
14 20118
15 20166
16 20165
17 20161

About Daniel Bosch

Daniel Bosch is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Plant Science and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), Pineapple and bromelain studies (2 papers), Phytase and its Applications (2 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (73 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (295 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (218 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations) and Genetics (88 citations). Daniel Bosch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ingrid Ehrlich, Susanne Schmid, Adolfo Saiardi, Omar Loss, Zsolt Szíjgyártó, Cristina Azevedo, Annalisa Lonetti, Francesco Ferraguti, Andreas Lüthi and John S. Yeomans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visualized Experiments, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, European Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact