Daniel Bock

695 citations
18 papers · 521 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bock

18 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Daniel Bock
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Immunology and Allergy 97
  • Immunology 293
  • Genetics 44
  • Physiology 19
  • Hematology 42
Replace Greg Henkel with:
Greg Henkel United States
Christina Stoeckle Switzerland
Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen Denmark
G. H. Thoenes Germany
Sharon Veenbergen Netherlands
John J. Kanalas United States
MS Klempner United States
Asuka Inoue Japan
Shinji Kagaya Japan
Andrew Cross United Kingdom
Daniel Bock relative to Greg Henkel United States Greg Henkel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Greg Henkel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bock. The network helps show where Daniel Bock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bock Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1997151
2 200554
3 201244
4 200739
5 200135
6 200131
7 199630
8 199929
9 199728
10 201124
11 200322
12 200614
13 20067
14 20105
15 20183
16 20112
17 19972
18
[An unforeseen incident in the use of a type A overhead-anesthesia system in an operating room].
19821

About Daniel Bock

Daniel Bock is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Allergy, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complement system in diseases (5 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (2 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (97 citations), Immunology (293 citations), Genetics (44 citations), Physiology (19 citations) and Hematology (42 citations). Daniel Bock has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Klos, Jörg Köhl, Ulrich Martin, Wilfried Bautsch, Lubomir Arseniev, Robert S. Ames, Arnold Ganser, Mark Tornetta, G. Wolff and Claudia Rheinheimer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, European Journal of Immunology, Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs and Medical Mycology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact