Daniel Baum

88 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Daniel Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 308
  • Structural Biology 133
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 290
  • Automotive Engineering 109
  • Cell Biology 143
Replace Steffen Prohaska with:
Steffen Prohaska Germany
Dilworth Y. Parkinson United States
Guido Ranzuglia Italy
Willem Jan Palenstijn Netherlands
Detlev Stalling Germany
Christoph Straehle Germany
Carsten Haubold Germany
Malte Westerhoff United States
Wim van Aarle Belgium
Robert S. Bradley United Kingdom
Daniel Baum relative to Steffen Prohaska Germany Steffen Prohaska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.2×
Steffen Prohaska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Baum. The network helps show where Daniel Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Baum Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015179
2 2020172
3 2011171
4 2020135
5 2022107
6 201692
7 201190
8 201559
9 201151
10 201049
11 202249
12 201648
13 201243
14 201642
15 198634
16 202334
17 201328
18 201626
19 201225
20 201524

About Daniel Baum

Daniel Baum is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Structural Biology, Urology and Geometry and Topology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (18 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (12 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (11 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (7 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (308 citations), Structural Biology (133 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (290 citations), Automotive Engineering (109 citations) and Cell Biology (143 citations). Daniel Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Christian Hege, Norbert Lindow, Steffen Prohaska, Jürgen Titschack, Thomas Müller‐Reichert, André Freiwald, Michael Krone, Gunther Mohr, Marc Baaden and Simon J. Altenburg. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Journal of Structural Biology, BMC Bioinformatics and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact