Daniel Ankrah

21 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Daniel Ankrah
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
  • Family Practice 21
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
  • General Health Professions 105
  • Infectious Diseases 76
Replace Birhanu Demeke Workneh with:
Birhanu Demeke Workneh Ethiopia
Ahmed M. Alshehri Saudi Arabia
Martie S. Lubbe South Africa
Tariku Shimels Ethiopia
Ángela Acosta Colombia
I Manji Kenya
Belay Negash Ethiopia
Yaregal Animut Ethiopia
Abdullah Algwizani Saudi Arabia
Ann R. Akiteng Uganda
Daniel Ankrah relative to Birhanu Demeke Workneh Ethiopia Birhanu Demeke Workneh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Birhanu Demeke Workneh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ankrah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ankrah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ankrah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ankrah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ankrah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ankrah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ankrah. The network helps show where Daniel Ankrah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ankrah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ankrah Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ankrah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 201448
3 202116
4 201815
5 202112
6 202310
7 20229
8 20108
9 20227
10 20137
11 20207
12 20145
13 20175
14 20175
15 20233
16 20203
17 20212
18 20212
19 20161
20 20121

About Daniel Ankrah

Daniel Ankrah is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers) and Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations) and Infectious Diseases (76 citations). Daniel Ankrah has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Irène Akua Agyepong, Daniel Arhinful, Aukje K. Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Margaret Lartey, Ellen S. Koster, Francis Asenso‐Boadi, Moses Aikins, Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey, Justice Nonvignon and Reuben K. Esena. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Preference and Adherence, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, Global Health Research and Policy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact