Daniel Andler

722 citations
35 papers · 370 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Andler

33 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Daniel Andler
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • History and Philosophy of Science 33
  • Philosophy 56
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
  • General Psychology 6
  • General Decision Sciences 8
Replace Marie Larochelle with:
Marie Larochelle Canada
Sylvia Kenig United States
John Brockman United Kingdom
Maurizio Ferraris Italy
Pascal Ragouet France
David Godden United States
Clive Sutton United Kingdom
Floyd Μerrell United States
Margarita Limón Spain
John E. McPeck Canada
Daniel Andler relative to Marie Larochelle Canada Marie Larochelle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Marie Larochelle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Andler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Andler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Andler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Andler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Andler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Andler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Andler. The network helps show where Daniel Andler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Andler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Andler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Andler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201279
2
Introduction aux sciences cognitives
199267
3 201866
4
D'une Science À l'Autre des Concepts Nomades
198733
5 201317
6 201213
7
Filosofia da ciência
20058
8
Reasoning and cognition
20067
9 20007
10
Context and background. Dreyfus and cognitive science
20007
11 19877
12 19906
13 20076
14
Intelligence artificielle : mythes et limites
19845
15 19925
16 20185
17 20094
18 20213
19 19933
20 20063

About Daniel Andler

Daniel Andler is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations), Philosophy (56 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations), General Psychology (6 citations) and General Decision Sciences (8 citations). Daniel Andler has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ralph Adolphs, Isabelle Stengers, Riccardo Viale, Lawrence A. Hirschfeld, Emile Servan-Schreiber, Jon Elster, Christian List, Hong Lu, Dan Sperber and Philippe Urfalino. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Emotion Review, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Philosophical Studies and Journal of Pragmatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact