Daniel Amsterdam

107 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Amsterdam
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Clinical Biochemistry 230
  • Molecular Medicine 157
  • Microbiology 158
  • Infectious Diseases 355
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
Replace Denis Beauchamp with:
Denis Beauchamp Canada
J. P. Ashby United Kingdom
Edward J. Wing United States
William T. Doerrler United States
Jesús Navas Spain
Marco Cassone United States
Jan Sjölin Sweden
Susan Nicholson United States
Marcus C. de Goffau Netherlands
Marianne S. Muhlebach United States
Daniel Amsterdam relative to Denis Beauchamp Canada Denis Beauchamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Denis Beauchamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Amsterdam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Amsterdam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Amsterdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Amsterdam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Amsterdam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Amsterdam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Amsterdam. The network helps show where Daniel Amsterdam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Amsterdam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Amsterdam Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Amsterdam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Susceptibility testing of antimicrobials in liquid media
1996441
2 2002156
3 197099
4 199298
5 198659
6 198755
7 200052
8 199946
9 199739
10 198931
11 201831
12 195930
13 201029
14 198628
15 198526
16 197224
17 198824
18 197624
19 199223
20 199023

About Daniel Amsterdam

Daniel Amsterdam is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (15 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (15 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (13 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (12 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (10 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (8 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (230 citations), Molecular Medicine (157 citations), Microbiology (158 citations), Infectious Diseases (355 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations). Daniel Amsterdam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alexander von Graevenitz, W R Bartholomew, S. Stanley Schneierson, Larry Schneck, J. Joseph Walshe, Ali El-Solh, Barbara E. Ostrov, Coleman Rotstein, Brydon J. B. Grant and M. Jeffery Mador. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Immunological Investigations, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Acta Neuropathologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact