Daniel A. Hunter

192 papers receiving 9.1k citations

Peers

Daniel A. Hunter
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 6.2k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 900
  • Transplantation 463
  • Biomaterials 1.4k
  • Surgery 4.2k
Replace Rajiv Midha with:
Rajiv Midha Canada
Gregory H. Borschel Canada
Stefano Geuna Italy
Thomas M. Brushart United States
Ahmet Höke United States
Nils Danielsen Sweden
G. Terenghi United Kingdom
Pierluigi Tos Italy
Zhifeng Xiao China
Paul J. Kingham Sweden
Daniel A. Hunter relative to Rajiv Midha Canada Rajiv Midha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Rajiv Midha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Hunter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Hunter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Hunter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Hunter. The network helps show where Daniel A. Hunter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Hunter Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Hunter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 192 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000345
2 2009338
3 2003336
4
Walking track analysis: a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery.
1992266
5 1984255
6 1994240
7 1997229
8 2004218
9 2011198
10 2013176
11 2007161
12 2014156
13 1985155
14 1985145
15 2008142
16 1985138
17 1985121
18 2008118
19 2011116
20 1987115

About Daniel A. Hunter

Daniel A. Hunter is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials and Transplantation, having authored 192 papers that have together received 9.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (144 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (46 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (26 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (18 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (16 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (16 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (15 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (6.2k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (900 citations), Transplantation (463 citations), Biomaterials (1.4k citations) and Surgery (4.2k citations). Daniel A. Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Susan E. Mackinnon, Alan R. Hudson, Michael Brenner, A. Lee Dellon, Philip J. Johnson, Amy M. Moore, Terence M. Myckatyn, Matthew D. Wood, Yan Yan and Gregory H. Borschel. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Microsurgery, Muscle & Nerve and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact