Michael Otsuka
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
- Philosophy 30
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 14
- War, Ethics, and Justification 11
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 28
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 3
- Co-authors
- Alex Voorhoeve (4 shared papers)Hillel Steiner (2 shared papers)Peter Vallentyne (2 shared papers)James Penner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy & Public Affairs (7 papers)Ethics (4 papers)Utilitas (3 papers)The Journal of Ethics (3 papers)Ratio (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Otsuka
48 papers receiving 840 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Philosophy 584
- Cognitive Neuroscience 492
- Political Science and International Relations 529
- General Decision Sciences 15
- Law 68
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Otsuka
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Otsuka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Otsuka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Otsuka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Otsuka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Otsuka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Otsuka. The network helps show where Michael Otsuka may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael Otsuka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 217 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 129 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 72 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 49 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 11 | THE PARADOX OF GROUP BENEFICENCE | 1991 | 23 |
| 12 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 13 |
About Michael Otsuka
Michael Otsuka is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (28 papers), Free Will and Agency (26 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (14 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (3 papers) and Legal principles and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (584 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (492 citations), Political Science and International Relations (529 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Law (68 citations). Michael Otsuka has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alex Voorhoeve, Hillel Steiner, Peter Vallentyne and James Penner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Public Affairs, Ethics, Utilitas, The Journal of Ethics and Ratio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.