Danhui Yang

32 papers receiving 901 citations

Peers

Danhui Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Neurology 139
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
  • Infectious Diseases 121
  • Molecular Biology 444
  • Plant Science 218
Replace Jianxiong Zeng with:
Jianxiong Zeng China
Ravi Kant Narayan India
Mohamed A. Soliman Egypt
Junna Kawasaki Japan
Rie Hasebe Japan
Danielle Aw United Kingdom
Kirthana Ganeshan United States
Dongliang Li China
Hanseul Oh South Korea
Komei Shirabe Japan
Danhui Yang relative to Jianxiong Zeng China Jianxiong Zeng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Jianxiong Zeng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danhui Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danhui Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danhui Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danhui Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danhui Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danhui Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danhui Yang. The network helps show where Danhui Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danhui Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danhui Yang Line = papers co-authored together Danhui Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995109
2 1998103
3 201177
4 202070
5 200170
6 202163
7 202055
8 200054
9 202135
10 202332
11 202126
12 199525
13 202223
14 202121
15 202220
16 200317
17 201915
18 202212
19 200412
20 202310

About Danhui Yang

Danhui Yang is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (12 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (10 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (3 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (139 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (121 citations), Molecular Biology (444 citations) and Plant Science (218 citations). Danhui Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bertil Andersson, Marika Lindahl, Hong Luo, Éva Nagy, Helena Grgić, Shuizi Ding, Cheng Lei, Jeanette I. Webster, Zach Adam and Itzhak Ohad. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Genetics, Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, European Journal of Biochemistry, BMC Pulmonary Medicine and Virus Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact