Dana L. Downs

22 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Dana L. Downs
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Emergency Medical Services 83
  • Gastroenterology 59
  • Neurology 77
  • Clinical Psychology 191
  • Social Psychology 91
Replace Victoria Owen with:
Victoria Owen United Kingdom
Emerald Poon Adler United States
PSVN Sharma India
Celia Martí García Spain
Jenny L McDonald Australia
Jan H. Bolk Netherlands
Émilie Gosselin Canada
Neesha Hussain‐Shamsy Canada
Lea Jabaaij Netherlands
Laura B. Meade United Kingdom
Dana L. Downs relative to Victoria Owen United Kingdom Victoria Owen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Victoria Owen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana L. Downs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana L. Downs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana L. Downs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana L. Downs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana L. Downs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana L. Downs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana L. Downs. The network helps show where Dana L. Downs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana L. Downs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana L. Downs Line = papers co-authored together Dana L. Downs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010157
2 200592
3 200481
4 201344
5 201035
6 201318
7 201618
8 201618
9 201616
10 202315
11 200911
12 201810
13 20178
14 20197
15 20157
16 20086
17
PTSD: A systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment: Accurate diagnosis and management depends on proper application of DSM-5 criteria
20184
18 20214
19
PTSD: A systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment
20183
20 20222

About Dana L. Downs

Dana L. Downs is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers), Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (83 citations), Gastroenterology (59 citations), Neurology (77 citations), Clinical Psychology (191 citations) and Social Psychology (91 citations). Dana L. Downs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Carol S. North, Deborah M. Galvin, Christopher L. Ringwalt, Edward L. Spitznagel, David E. Pollio, Keith S. Garcia, Katherine J. Pierce, MICHAEL R. JARVIS, Keith E. Isenberg and Richard V. King. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services, Community Mental Health Journal, Archives of Suicide Research and Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact