Dana Krämer
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Neurology top 10%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Signaling Pathways in Disease 3
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 1
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
- Co-authors
- Liliana Minichiello (5 shared papers)Friederike Frommer (1 shared paper)Thorsten Buch (1 shared paper)George Kassiotis (1 shared paper)Hans Lassmann (1 shared paper)Ksanthi Kranidioti (1 shared paper)Nadine Hövelmeyer (1 shared paper)George Kollias (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (1 paper)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Cell Metabolism (1 paper)Journal of Dairy Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Dana Krämer
9 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Developmental Neuroscience 56
- Neurology 62
- Cancer Research 84
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
- Molecular Biology 214
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Krämer
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Krämer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Krämer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Krämer. The network helps show where Dana Krämer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 1 |
About Dana Krämer
Dana Krämer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (56 citations), Neurology (62 citations), Cancer Research (84 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (68 citations) and Molecular Biology (214 citations). Dana Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Liliana Minichiello, Friederike Frommer, Thorsten Buch, George Kassiotis, Hans Lassmann, Ksanthi Kranidioti, Nadine Hövelmeyer, George Kollias, Ari Waisman and Zhenyue Hao. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cell Metabolism and Journal of Dairy Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.