Dana Button

12 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Dana Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Neurology 26
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
  • Genetics 81
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 13
Replace Bernadette O’Donovan with:
Bernadette O’Donovan United States
Walid Fazeli Germany
Joanna Śmigielska–Kuzia Poland
Miren Altuna Spain
Tristan H. Lewis United States
Jessica Lowe United Kingdom
Tianzuo Li China
Lilia E. Ziganshina Russia
Haiyin Li China
Héctor Hugo Berra Argentina
Dana Button relative to Bernadette O’Donovan United States Bernadette O’Donovan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Bernadette O’Donovan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Button. The network helps show where Dana Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dana Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana Button Line = papers co-authored together Dana Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019105
2 201562
3 202052
4 202148
5 202227
6 202213
7 20229
8 20249
9 20208
10 20217
11 20222
12
Quest. A chance wasted?
19891
13 20220
14 20210

About Dana Button

Dana Button is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (26 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (57 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Genetics (81 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (13 citations). Dana Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include William A. Liguore, Jodi L. McBride, Jacqueline S. Domire, Sathya Srinivasan, Yun Wang, Brett D. Dufour, Alison R. Weiss, Honora Englander, Ximena A. Levander and Jonathan R. Lindner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Drug Policy, Molecular Therapy, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine and The Journal of Rural Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact