Amber Lin

1.8k citations
68 papers · 853 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Amber Lin

61 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Amber Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Emergency Medicine 413
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 38
  • Neurology 85
  • Gender Studies 51
Replace Richard D. Blondell with:
Richard D. Blondell United States
Debra Eagles Canada
Keith H. Berge United States
Christopher Frank Canada
Marc L. Martel United States
Jeffrey D. Ho United States
Aleda M. Leis United States
Keerat Grewal Canada
Michael L. Foreman United States
Linda S. Stephens United States
Amber Lin relative to Richard D. Blondell United States Richard D. Blondell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Richard D. Blondell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Lin. The network helps show where Amber Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Lin Line = papers co-authored together Amber Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201789
2 201662
3 202050
4 201744
5 201641
6 202040
7 201929
8 201928
9 202126
10 201721
11 202021
12 201918
13 202218
14 201818
15 202017
16 201917
17 202116
18 201816
19 201715
20 201915

About Amber Lin

Amber Lin is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Neurology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (20 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (14 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (8 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (6 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (413 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (58 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (38 citations), Neurology (85 citations) and Gender Studies (51 citations). Amber Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David C. Sheridan, Craig D. Newgard, K. John McConnell, Benjamin Sun, Anna Marie Chang, Robert G. Hendrickson, Rongwei Fu, B. Zane Horowitz, Rongwei Fu and Susan Malveau. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Toxicology, Academic Emergency Medicine, Pediatric Emergency Care, Annals of Emergency Medicine and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact