Sheldon M. Stern
Impact in
- History top 1%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Caribbean history, culture, and politics
- Latin American and Latino Studies
Papers in
-
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy 2
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Co-authors
- George M. Fredrickson (1 shared paper)Claudio Cobelli (1 shared paper)Luigi Mariani (1 shared paper)Lawrence Freedman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)Reviews in American History (2 papers)The Oral History Review (2 papers)Presidential Studies Quarterly (2 papers)Foreign Affairs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Sheldon M. Stern
19 papers receiving 412 citations
Sheldon M. Stern's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- History 96
- Cultural Studies 63
- Music 23
- Marketing 66
- Literature and Literary Theory 78
Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon M. Stern
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon M. Stern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon M. Stern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon M. Stern more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon M. Stern
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon M. Stern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon M. Stern. The network helps show where Sheldon M. Stern may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon M. Stern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Black Image in the White Mind: The Debate on Afro-American Character and Destiny, 1817-1914 Hit paper breakdown → | 1974 | 438 |
| 2 | 1991 | 142 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 6 | The State "of" State U.S. History Standards 2011. | 2011 | 9 |
| 7 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 1 |
About Sheldon M. Stern
Sheldon M. Stern is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Medical Laboratory Technology, History and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (2 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (1 paper), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (1 paper) and German History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (96 citations), Cultural Studies (63 citations), Music (23 citations), Marketing (66 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations). Sheldon M. Stern has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include George M. Fredrickson, Claudio Cobelli, Luigi Mariani and Lawrence Freedman. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Reviews in American History, The Oral History Review, Presidential Studies Quarterly and Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.