Patterns of Prejudice

825 papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 825 papers published in Patterns of Prejudice in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Patterns of Prejudice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (448 papers), Political Science and International Relations (243 papers) and History (84 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (120 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (101 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Patterns of Prejudice are Nira Yuval‐Davis, Maria Balinska, Tjitske Akkerman, Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Farid Hafez, Hans‐Georg Betz, Susi Meret, Cas Mudde and Alana Lentin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Patterns of Prejudice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Patterns of Prejudice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Patterns of Prejudice.

Countries where authors publish in Patterns of Prejudice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Patterns of Prejudice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Patterns of Prejudice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patterns of Prejudice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025