Daichi Maeda

87 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Daichi Maeda's Hit Papers

Clinical guidelines for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome 2020 · 174 citations
1740+2+4Years since publication50100150

Peers

Daichi Maeda
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Urology 512
  • Reproductive Medicine 439
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 210
  • Cancer Research 319
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 299
Replace Gian Luigi Taddei with:
Gian Luigi Taddei Italy
Maija Kiuru United States
Isabela Werneck da Cunha Brazil
Gloria A. Niehans United States
Pamela J. Farmer Australia
Andrés Matoso United States
Francesca Megiorni Italy
David Walterhouse United States
Hermann Rogatsch Austria
Motomu Tsuji Japan
Daichi Maeda relative to Gian Luigi Taddei Italy Gian Luigi Taddei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Gian Luigi Taddei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daichi Maeda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daichi Maeda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daichi Maeda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daichi Maeda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daichi Maeda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daichi Maeda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daichi Maeda. The network helps show where Daichi Maeda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daichi Maeda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daichi Maeda Line = papers co-authored together Daichi Maeda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011228
2
Clinical guidelines for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome
Hit paper breakdown →
2020174
3 2020126
4 2015126
5 2009105
6 201093
7 201292
8 201290
9 201085
10 201383
11 201068
12 201868
13 201162
14 201959
15 201856
16 201753
17 201953
18 201251
19 201640
20 201739

About Daichi Maeda

Daichi Maeda is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (11 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (5 papers) and Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (512 citations), Reproductive Medicine (439 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (210 citations), Cancer Research (319 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (299 citations). Daichi Maeda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Masashi Fukayama, Yukio Homma, Ie‐Ming Shih, Yoshiyuki Akiyama, Akiteru Goto, Teppei Morikawa, Shunsuke Nakagawa, Tetsu Yano, Tsui-Lien Mao and Tian‐Li Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Human Pathology, Histopathology, Cancer Research and International Journal of Gynecological Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact