Daan Scheepers

84 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Daan Scheepers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Psychology 428
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
  • Gender Studies 379
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 335
Replace Joris Lammers with:
Joris Lammers Germany
Jacquie D. Vorauer Canada
Danielle Gaucher Canada
Steven Fein United States
Constantine Sedikides United Kingdom
Shira Gabriel United States
Ana Guinote United Kingdom
Jennifer Whitson United States
Lowell Gaertner United States
Curtis D. Hardin United States
Daan Scheepers relative to Joris Lammers Germany Joris Lammers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Joris Lammers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daan Scheepers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daan Scheepers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daan Scheepers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daan Scheepers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daan Scheepers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daan Scheepers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daan Scheepers. The network helps show where Daan Scheepers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daan Scheepers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daan Scheepers Line = papers co-authored together Daan Scheepers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998274
2 2004214
3 2006167
4 2019163
5 2013134
6 2011119
7 2009111
8 2008111
9 201183
10 200283
11 201075
12 200874
13 200662
14 201759
15 200357
16 200255
17 201854
18 201346
19 201742
20 200240

About Daan Scheepers

Daan Scheepers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (63 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (41 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (22 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (428 citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.9k citations), Gender Studies (379 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (335 citations). Daan Scheepers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears, Kai Sassenberg, Frank de Wit, Bertjan Doosje, Antony S. R. Manstead, Karen A. Jehn, Annika Scholl, Belle Derks and Tom Postmes. Their work appears in journals such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and European Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact