D. Scott Wright

30 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

D. Scott Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Electrochemistry 47
  • Spectroscopy 126
  • Analytical Chemistry 72
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 116
  • Pharmacology 39
Replace Massimo Breda with:
Massimo Breda Italy
Malonne I. Davies United States
Osamu Nozaki Japan
P. Kwasowski United Kingdom
Päivi Uutela Finland
Hossein Amini Iran
Inés de Lannoy Canada
Gregory C. Davis United States
Katsushi Furuno Japan
G. Land United Kingdom
D. Scott Wright relative to Massimo Breda Italy Massimo Breda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Massimo Breda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Scott Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Scott Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Scott Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Scott Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Scott Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Scott Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Scott Wright. The network helps show where D. Scott Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Scott Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Scott Wright Line = papers co-authored together D. Scott Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199465
2 198852
3 199751
4 199741
5 199840
6 200539
7 199832
8 198331
9
The search for John Doe 2: Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing
199927
10 199124
11 198622
12 199617
13 199615
14 198613
15 198713
16 198710
17 199610
18
Handbook of Applied Cognition
199910
19 19889
20 19978

About D. Scott Wright

D. Scott Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Spectroscopy, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 33 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (7 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (47 citations), Spectroscopy (126 citations), Analytical Chemistry (72 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (116 citations) and Pharmacology (39 citations). D. Scott Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include David T. Rossi, Lawrence A. Pachla, William R. Heineman, H. Brian Halsall, Donald L. Reynolds, Be‐Sheng Kuo, Allen J. Sedman, S. Rutherfoord Rose, Rukmini Rajagopalan and Phillip A. Reece. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Pharmaceutical Research, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Analytical Chemistry and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact