Д. Набер
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Epilepsy research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 13
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 3
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 2
- Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Hanns Hippius (2 shared papers)D. Pickar (4 shared papers)Anne Karow (1 shared paper)Martin Lambert (1 shared paper)Misha Cohen (1 shared paper)Thomas C. Baghai (1 shared paper)R Spatz (1 shared paper)W. Günther (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pharmacopsychiatry (8 papers)European Neuropsychopharmacology (3 papers)Schizophrenia Research (2 papers)Value in Health (2 papers)Biological Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Д. Набер
25 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 250
- Biological Psychiatry 18
- Behavioral Neuroscience 23
- Philosophy 58
- Clinical Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Д. Набер
This map shows the geographic impact of Д. Набер's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Д. Набер with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Д. Набер more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Д. Набер
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Д. Набер. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Д. Набер. The network helps show where Д. Набер may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Д. Набер, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 79 | |
| 2 | Clinical studies of the endogenous opioid system. | 1982 | 69 |
| 3 | 1993 | 56 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 42 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 9 | Algorithms for the treatment of schizophrenia. | 1995 | 10 |
| 10 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 2 |
About Д. Набер
Д. Набер is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Pharmacology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (250 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations), Philosophy (58 citations) and Clinical Psychology (83 citations). Д. Набер has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hanns Hippius, D. Pickar, Anne Karow, Martin Lambert, Misha Cohen, Thomas C. Baghai, R Spatz, W. Günther, H Hippius and Volker Klauß. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Research, Value in Health and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.