D. Michael Young

480 citations
9 papers · 421 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

D. Michael Young

9 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

D. Michael Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 119
  • Cell Biology 92
  • Animal Science and Zoology 44
  • Molecular Biology 270
  • Spectroscopy 37
Replace Pearl Appel with:
Pearl Appel United States
Joseph A. Duke United States
Jean‐Jacques Béchet France
Stephen P. Chock United States
T.-C. Tsao Taiwan
J. G. Watterson Switzerland
Fumiko Murakami Japan
Y. Michael Peyser Israel
Tetsu Hozumi Japan
Andrea Migala Germany
D. Michael Young relative to Pearl Appel United States Pearl Appel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pearl Appel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Michael Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Michael Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Michael Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Michael Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Michael Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Michael Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Michael Young. The network helps show where D. Michael Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside D. Michael Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Michael Young Line = papers co-authored together D. Michael Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1965119
2 196487
3 196358
4 196454
5 196336
6 197529
7 196225
8 19589
9
A Study of the Factors Influencing the Rate and Extent of Enzymic Reactivation during Reoxidation of Reduced Ribonucelase
19624

About D. Michael Young

D. Michael Young is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Genetics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (1 paper), Protein purification and stability (1 paper) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (119 citations), Cell Biology (92 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (44 citations), Molecular Biology (270 citations) and Spectroscopy (37 citations). D. Michael Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William F. Harrington, Sylvia Himmelfarb, John T. Potts, Christian B. Anfinsen, Robert McGuire, Isaac Feldman, W. Wayne Kielley, Charles B. Epstein and Robert F. Goldberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Biopolymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact