D Elderfield

575 citations
28 papers · 475 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

D Elderfield

28 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

D Elderfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Condensed Matter Physics 418
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 152
  • Mathematical Physics 74
  • Economics and Econometrics 165
  • Materials Chemistry 227
Replace J. W. Lyklema with:
J. W. Lyklema Germany
Kenneth Hui United States
Yohtaro Ueno Japan
D. M. Saul United States
C. Buzano Italy
Eduardo Lage Portugal
Ioannis A. Hadjiagapiou Greece
T. Temesvári Hungary
S. Naya Japan
Francesco di Liberto Italy
D Elderfield relative to J. W. Lyklema Germany J. W. Lyklema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
J. W. Lyklema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D Elderfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D Elderfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D Elderfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D Elderfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D Elderfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D Elderfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D Elderfield. The network helps show where D Elderfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside D Elderfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D Elderfield Line = papers co-authored together D Elderfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198383
2 198342
3 198342
4 198234
5 198333
6 198530
7 198224
8 198717
9 198516
10 197814
11 197813
12 198413
13 198012
14 198511
15 198211
16 19859
17 19829
18 19878
19 19838
20 19848

About D Elderfield

D Elderfield is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Economics and Econometrics, Materials Chemistry and Mathematical Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (26 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (11 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (11 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (7 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (5 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (4 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (418 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (152 citations), Mathematical Physics (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (165 citations) and Materials Chemistry (227 citations). D Elderfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David C. Sherrington, Paul M. Goldbart, Dimitri D. Vvedensky, Alan J. McKane, Mark Richard Wilby, D. M. Cragg and Tom Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General and Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact