D. Edwin Swift

30 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

D. Edwin Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 294
  • Environmental Engineering 334
  • Global and Planetary Change 419
  • Ecology 420
  • Atmospheric Science 108
Replace Kelvin D. Montagu with:
Kelvin D. Montagu Australia
Eric C. Turnblom United States
Chhun-Huor Ung Canada
Henrique Ferraço Scolforo Brazil
Jaakko Repola Finland
Brian E. Roth United States
David M. Drew South Africa
James B. McCarter United States
Veli‐Pekka Ikonen Finland
François de Coligny France
D. Edwin Swift relative to Kelvin D. Montagu Australia Kelvin D. Montagu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Kelvin D. Montagu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Edwin Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Edwin Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Edwin Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Edwin Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Edwin Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Edwin Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Edwin Swift. The network helps show where D. Edwin Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Edwin Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Edwin Swift Line = papers co-authored together D. Edwin Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002459
2 200666
3 200860
4
Characterization of Knots in Plantation White Spruce
201325
5 200524
6 201121
7 200721
8 201119
9 200815
10 200611
11 200311
12 201011
13 200811
14 20169
15
Assessment of white spruce and jack pine stem curvature from a nelder spacing experiment.
20137
16 20167
17 20136
18 20076
19 20066
20 20076

About D. Edwin Swift

D. Edwin Swift is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 31 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (21 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (9 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (7 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Wood Treatment and Properties (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (294 citations), Environmental Engineering (334 citations), Global and Planetary Change (419 citations), Ecology (420 citations) and Atmospheric Science (108 citations). D. Edwin Swift has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Niger. Frequent co-authors include Petri Pellikka, J. Cihlar, Derek R. Peddle, Douglas J. King, G Pavlic, Sylvain G. Leblanc, J. A. Trofymow, J.J. van der Sanden, Ronald J. Hall and H. Peter White. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, The Forestry Chronicle, Ecological Modelling, Tree Physiology and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact