D. Ebert

2.0k citations
54 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

D. Ebert

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

D. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 821
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 578
  • Biological Psychiatry 55
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 52
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 267
Replace W. Soni with:
W. Soni United Kingdom
Steven B. Schwarzkopf United States
Robert W. Buchanan United States
Marie‐Chantal Bourdel France
J.R. DeQuardo United States
Stella G. Giakoumaki Greece
Martina Ballmaier United States
D. Kemali Italy
E. Hazlett United States
Daniele Radaelli Italy
D. Ebert relative to W. Soni United Kingdom W. Soni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
W. Soni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Ebert. The network helps show where D. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together D. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002158
2 2003152
3 2002134
4 1996122
5 2014118
6
[ADHD in adulthood--guidelines based on expert consensus with DGPPN support].
200388
7 199884
8 200775
9 200174
10 199665
11
ADHS im Erwachsenenalter - Leitlinien auf der Basis eines Expertenkonsensus mit Unterstützung der DGPPN
200359
12 201041
13 199334
14 199733
15 200332
16 200732
17 201129
18 199725
19 200324
20 199522

About D. Ebert

D. Ebert is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (821 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (578 citations), Biological Psychiatry (55 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (52 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (267 citations). D. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ludger Tebartz van Elst, Bernd Heßlinger, Jürgen Hennig, T Thiel, Jenny Krause, Thomas Berger, H. Feistel, Thomas Loew, Evgeniy Perlov and Michael Trimble. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, Epilepsy & Behavior, Psychopharmacology, Molecular Psychiatry and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact