C.W. Law

1.2k citations
29 papers · 924 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

C.W. Law

29 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

C.W. Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 536
  • Clinical Psychology 195
  • Philosophy 87
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
  • General Health Professions 136
Replace Cindy P.Y. Chiu with:
Cindy P.Y. Chiu Hong Kong
Peter Whitty Ireland
Marialuisa Cavelti Switzerland
Dimitri Perivoliotis United States
Nicholas J. K. Breitborde United States
Marius Romme Netherlands
Lewis A. Opler United States
Richard Corrigall United Kingdom
Isobel Harrison United Kingdom
Emi Ikebuchi Japan
C.W. Law relative to Cindy P.Y. Chiu Hong Kong Cindy P.Y. Chiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cindy P.Y. Chiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Law. The network helps show where C.W. Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.W. Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.W. Law Line = papers co-authored together C.W. Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010106
2 200593
3 201077
4 201075
5 200873
6 201167
7 200951
8 200548
9 201248
10 200845
11 201143
12 200538
13 200634
14 201331
15 201030
16 200528
17
Three-year outcome of phase-specific early intervention for first-episode psychosis: a cohort study in Hong Kong.
20127
18 20226
19 20034
20 20054

About C.W. Law

C.W. Law is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (536 citations), Clinical Psychology (195 citations), Philosophy (87 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations) and General Health Professions (136 citations). C.W. Law has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric Chen, Cindy P.Y. Chiu, Raymond C. K. Chan, May M.L. Lam, Christy Lai Ming Hui, Roger Ng, Veronica Pearson, Dicky W. S. Chung, Gráinne McAlonan and Steve Tso. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact