Craig Bourne

748 citations
25 papers · 363 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Craig Bourne

20 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Craig Bourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • History and Philosophy of Science 133
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 248
  • Philosophy 178
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 45
Replace Robert Charles Koons with:
Robert Charles Koons United States
Simon Prosser United Kingdom
Natalja Deng South Korea
L. Nathan Oaklander United States
Peter Forrest Australia
Jiri Benovsky Switzerland
Gary S. Rosenkrantz United States
Sherrilyn Roush United States
Giuliano Torrengo Italy
Barry Dainton United Kingdom
Craig Bourne relative to Robert Charles Koons United States Robert Charles Koons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Charles Koons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Bourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Bourne. The network helps show where Craig Bourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Craig Bourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Bourne Line = papers co-authored together Craig Bourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006181
2 200264
3 200621
4 200517
5 200413
6 200411
7 20169
8 20198
9 20185
10 20045
11 20124
12 20164
13 20063
14
Presentism: Essential Readings
20103
15 20173
16 20203
17 20112
18 20162
19 20061
20
ZAMM and the Art of Philosophical Fiction
20141

About Craig Bourne

Craig Bourne is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (248 citations), Philosophy (178 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (41 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (45 citations). Craig Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include John Bigelow, Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson, Trenton Merricks, Arthur N. Prior, Simon Keller, William Lane Craig, Hilary Putnam, Rafaël De Clercq and Dean W. Zimmerman. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The British Journal of Aesthetics, Philosophical Psychology, dialectica and Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact