Craig Bourne

723 citations
19 papers · 277 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Craig Bourne

16 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Craig Bourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 103
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
  • Philosophy 159
  • General Psychology 3
  • General Decision Sciences 4
Replace Peter Forrest with:
Peter Forrest Australia
Jiri Benovsky Switzerland
Natalja Deng South Korea
Darren Bradley United Kingdom
Simon Prosser United Kingdom
Dan Marshall Hong Kong
Jonathan Tallant United Kingdom
Giuliano Torrengo Italy
L. Nathan Oaklander United States
Howard Robinson United Kingdom
Craig Bourne relative to Peter Forrest Australia Peter Forrest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Peter Forrest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Bourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Bourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Bourne. The network helps show where Craig Bourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Craig Bourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Bourne Line = papers co-authored together Craig Bourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2006139
2 200253
3 200617
4 200514
5 200410
6 200410
7 20197
8 20167
9 20184
10 20124
11 20043
12 20172
13 20162
14 20112
15
ZAMM and the Art of Philosophical Fiction
20141
16
Presentism: Essential Readings
20101
17 20161
18 20250
19
Philosophical Ridings: Motorcycles and the Meaning of Life
20070

About Craig Bourne

Craig Bourne is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper), Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations), Philosophy (159 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Craig Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Crisp, Simon Keller, Dean W. Zimmerman, Hilary Putnam, Trenton Merricks, Matthew Davidson, John Bigelow, William Lane Craig and A. N. Prior. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophical Psychology, Journal of Philosophy of Education, The British Journal of Aesthetics and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact