Cornelia Daheim
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
Papers in
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 2
-
- Digital Games and Media 1
- Co-authors
- Eckhard Störmer (2 shared papers)Martin Rhisiart (1 shared paper)Andy Hines (1 shared paper)Sven Hirsch (3 shared papers)Kerstin Cuhls (1 shared paper)Karlheinz Steinmüller (1 shared paper)Gualtiero Fantoni (1 shared paper)Andreas Neef (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change (1 paper)Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (1 paper)Futures (1 paper)foresight (1 paper)European Journal of Futures Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
Cornelia Daheim
10 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Strategy and Management 96
- Management Science and Operations Research 77
- Management of Technology and Innovation 40
- Fuel Technology 2
- Business and International Management 5
Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Daheim
This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Daheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Daheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Daheim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Daheim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Daheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Daheim. The network helps show where Cornelia Daheim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Daheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 126 | |
| 2 | The Future of Work Jobs and Skills in 2030 | 2014 | 49 |
| 3 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | Emerging practices in foresight and their use in STI policy | 2015 | 1 |
| 10 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 0 |
About Cornelia Daheim
Cornelia Daheim is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Regional resilience and development (2 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (96 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (77 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (40 citations), Fuel Technology (2 citations) and Business and International Management (5 citations). Cornelia Daheim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eckhard Störmer, Martin Rhisiart, Andy Hines, Sven Hirsch, Kerstin Cuhls, Karlheinz Steinmüller, Gualtiero Fantoni and Andreas Neef. Their work appears in journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Futures, foresight and European Journal of Futures Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.