Corinna Baum

422 citations
13 papers · 299 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Corinna Baum

11 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Corinna Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
  • Pharmacology 115
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 129
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Stéphanie Cormier with:
Stéphanie Cormier Canada
Denise Beasley United States
Fatanah Ramlee Malaysia
JAMES A. BRAITH United States
Sophia Åkerblom Sweden
Carter E. Bedford United States
Adrienne L. Adler-Neal United States
Megan E. Kurth United States
Sarah E. Priddy United States
William T. Nay United States
Corinna Baum relative to Stéphanie Cormier Canada Stéphanie Cormier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Stéphanie Cormier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Corinna Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corinna Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corinna Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corinna Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corinna Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corinna Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corinna Baum. The network helps show where Corinna Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Corinna Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Corinna Baum Line = papers co-authored together Corinna Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200957
2 201143
3 201142
4 201340
5 201634
6 202233
7 201817
8 201312
9 201311
10 20159
11 20211
12 20250
13 20250

About Corinna Baum

Corinna Baum is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (129 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Corinna Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Lautenbacher, Claudia Huber, Edmund Keogh, Anne Martinelli, Thomas Heidenreich, Willem Kuyken, Johannes Michalak, Martin Bohus, Regina Steil and Rolf Rossaint. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Pain Research, Pain Medicine, Pain Research and Management and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact