Constance M. John

52 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Constance M. John
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Microbiology 448
  • Molecular Medicine 130
  • Immunology 520
  • Reproductive Medicine 174
  • Endocrinology 96
Replace Michael Hunter with:
Michael Hunter United Kingdom
Joe Dan Dunn United States
Sajad Ahmad Dar India
Ingemar Carlstedt Sweden
Charlene M. Kahler Australia
Hans-Gerd Schiefer Germany
Andrea Ardizzoni Italy
Hans Tapper Sweden
Mary C. Rose United States
Joachim Riethmüller Germany
Constance M. John relative to Michael Hunter United Kingdom Michael Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Michael Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance M. John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance M. John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance M. John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance M. John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance M. John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance M. John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance M. John. The network helps show where Constance M. John may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance M. John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance M. John Line = papers co-authored together Constance M. John links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991124
2
Truncated galectin-3 inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in orthotopic nude mouse model of human breast cancer.
2003115
3 1991114
4 2017108
5 2013105
6 2010105
7 201491
8 199077
9 199774
10 200364
11 200258
12 201155
13 201054
14 199449
15 201248
16 199446
17 200842
18 201338
19 202237
20 199934

About Constance M. John

Constance M. John is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Immunology, Epidemiology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (16 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (11 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (8 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (8 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (448 citations), Molecular Medicine (130 citations), Immunology (520 citations), Reproductive Medicine (174 citations) and Endocrinology (96 citations). Constance M. John has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gary A. Jarvis, Bradford W. Gibson, Mingfeng Liu, J. McLeod Griffiss, Michael A. Apicella, Nancy J. Phillips, Robert E. Mandrell, Hakon Leffler, John H. Griffin and C. Yan Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Lipid Research, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Infection and Immunity and Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact