Conrad Baldner

614 citations
36 papers · 402 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Conrad Baldner

34 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Conrad Baldner
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Applied Psychology 79
  • Social Psychology 180
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
  • Gender Studies 49
Replace Alberto Becerra with:
Alberto Becerra Spain
Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno United States
Marjolein Maas Netherlands
Saera R. Khan United States
Saaid A. Mendoza United States
Jonathan Iuzzini United States
Ana I. Gheorghiu United Kingdom
Douglas M. Stenstrom United States
Jennifer Tong Hong Kong
Jillian K. Swencionis United States
Conrad Baldner relative to Alberto Becerra Spain Alberto Becerra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Alberto Becerra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Baldner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Baldner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Baldner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Baldner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Baldner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Baldner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Baldner. The network helps show where Conrad Baldner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Conrad Baldner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conrad Baldner Line = papers co-authored together Conrad Baldner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201586
2 201467
3 201829
4 201928
5 201723
6 201920
7 201813
8 202012
9 202311
10 202210
11 20239
12 20228
13 20218
14 20186
15 20156
16 20206
17 20216
18 20235
19 20185
20 20235

About Conrad Baldner

Conrad Baldner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (79 citations), Social Psychology (180 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations) and Gender Studies (49 citations). Conrad Baldner has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Pierro, Arie W. Kruglanski, Marina Chernikova, Daniela Di Santo, Katarzyna Jaśko, Maxim Babush, Maxim Milyavsky, Mauro Giacomantonio, Alessandra Talamo and Valeria De Cristofaro. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Personality and Individual Differences and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact